Abstract:

The routine use of highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) has remained controversial secondary to the possibility of decreased material properties when compared to conventional UHMWPE. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if thin, sequentially-irradiated, and annealed highly cross-linked UHMWPE tibial inserts would have improved wear properties, while maintaining mechanical integrity, compared to conventional UHMWPE during biomechanical testing under aligned and malaligned conditions. Polyethylene inserts (4.27 and 6.27mm) manufactured from GUR 1020-UHMWPE were cyclically loaded to analyze for wear. All wear scars were visually examined after loading using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Volume loss was plotted versus cycle count with linear regression analysis yielding wear rates. There was no statistical difference in wear between both thicknesses for all testing conditions. During aligned condition testing, the volumetric wear rate for sequentially-irradiated and annealed polyethylene thicknesses of 4.27 and 6.27mm was 4.0 and 4.4mm3/million cycles; and during malaligned conditions, it was 13.9 and 15.1mm3/million cycles. For conventional polyethylene during aligned conditions, the volumetric wear rate was 33.0 and 22.8mm3/million cycles; and during malaligned conditions it was 50.0 and 50.8mm3/million cycles. By SEM evaluation, condylar wear surfaces for conventional and sequentially-irradiated and annealed polyethylene displayed surface ripples typical of adhesive wear. There were no observed visible differences between the wear scars for conventional compared to sequentially-irradiated and annealed polyethylene with no evidence of fatigue failure. This study demonstrated no differences between polyethylenes with thicknesses of 4.27 and 6.27mm. This strengthens the conclusion that sequentially-irradiated and annealed highly cross-linked UHMWPE can be utilized in total knee arthroplasty. The successful wear properties of 4.27mm liners could mean that smaller tibial resections leading to bone stock preservation could be utilized in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, although further in-vivo studies are needed.

Authors:

Siraj A. Sayeed, MD, M.Eng, President, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, South Texas Bone and Joint Institute, San Antonio, Texas, Julio J. Jauregui, MD, Orthopaedic Research Fellow, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland, Laryssa A. Korduba, MS, Robotics Training Manager, Orthopaedic Department, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, New Jersey, Aaron Essner, MS, Director Research and Development, Orthopaedic Department, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, New Jersey, Steven F. Harwin, MD, Chief of Adult Reconstruction and Total Joint Replacement, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York, Ronald E. Delanois, MD, Fellowship Director, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland, Michael A. Mont, MD, Director, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland

For Direct IP Access please click this link